Electoral.Graphics
en-USru-RU
Language
Search
× Search
Menu
    1. Статьи
  2. Методы
    1. Генератор гистограмм
    2. Скаттер-плоттер
    3. Плоттер Габдульвалеева
    4. Анализатор последней цифры
    5. Спец-приборы
    6. Другие модули
      1. Генератор гистограмм v.1.0
      2. Скаттер-плоттер v 1.0
      3. Генератор плавных гистограмм
      4. Диаграмма Габдульвалеева v 1.0
    1. Навигатор по выборам
      1. с датасетами
      2. в Лаборатории
  5. Лекторий
  6. Открытия
  7. О проекте
Saturday, November 2, 2024
HomeArticles

Articles

All articles of Electoral.Graphics

Articles on the website

You have selected:

Sergey Shpilkin. II Round Table of Mathematicians. 2018

Сергей Шпилькин
/ Categories: Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Lectures and presentations, II Round Table, Videos

Sergey Shpilkin. II Round Table of Mathematicians. 2018

Closed discussions. Presentation "2018 Azerbaijan presidential elections: What the numbers say"

Sergei Shpilkin. II Roundtable of Mathematicians. 2018

Closed discussions of the Round Table. Presentation "2018 Azerbaijan presidential elections: What the numbers say"

Открыть презентацию

Previous Article Sergey Shpilkin "Azerbaijani presidential elections 2018: what the numbers can tell us"
Next Article Assignment: find the top three most criminal elections of EDG 2019
Print
21498

Similar articles

Tags: Video
Please login or register to post comments.

Elections in the article

On the same topic

DIY Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram DIY Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram

DIY Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram

Good news for electoral observers, journalists and election investigators. You have a new and long-awaited tool - the interactive Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram. This detailed video lesson will help you understand how to work with this kit, what the advantages of an integrated approach are, how the tools help each other to detect an anomaly, or how the findings of one tool confirm the findings of...
New parameters to explore New parameters to explore

New parameters to explore

But new, non-transparent types of voting in Russia we introduce new parameters for studying elections in the Lab. The "ntransparent vote opens new horizons for your research.

Criticism and bibliography Criticism and bibliography

Criticism and bibliography

The peer-reviewed paper again raises the question about the incorrectness of the statistical analysis. But it is based on a misunderstanding: the authors rightly point out and confirm with numerous examples that the histograms of elections may well be very different from the «Gaussian» even in the absence of falsifications. Probably, they have not seen the works mentioned above and...
Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections" Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections"

Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections"

Yes, something must be done with our society, which «still has some flaws». It is very gullible and therefore prefers Shpilkin to Borisov. But it is necessary to implement a number of measures to remove distrust in the procedures for establishing the results of voting». It is possible, for example, to establish not only a captcha for obtaining these results, but to declare...
Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report

Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report

3 сентября 2020 года на сайте Российского общественного института избирательного права (РОИИП) был опубликован доклад "Математические инструменты делегитимации выборов". In it, the authors criticized one of the methods of analysis: unimodality. They concluded that "with existing methods of mathematical analysis it is impossible to describe and make an...
12345
Terms Of UsePrivacy Statement2018-2023
Back To Top