EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Altai Republic, Bashkortostan (Rep. of), Volgograd Oblast, Vologda Oblast, Zabaykalsky Krai, Kalmykia (Republic of), Kursk Oblast, Saint Petersburg (city of), Sakhalin Oblast, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, StatContest 2019. The Criminal Top Three Natalia Z. The most suspicious elections 2019 Homework from Natalia Z. for the Visualizing Democracy course Laborator's note: Natalia has a keen eye! She has discerned valid coincidences between the results in TEC "Nevel ship" and similar TECs in Sakhalin. But as in the case with the Murmansk Ship Commissions, such coincidence has a natural origin. Thus, the graphs obtained in our Laboratory show that the number of voters at the suspicious PECs is 17: While the number of votes for Limarenko is 10. 17, perhaps, is a standard collective of a fishing trawler. And 10 is a coincidence, rare, but not "impossible" with a collective of 17 people. The coincidence of results on small collectives of a dozen or two people is mathematical in nature, while the coincidence on PECs with 1,000-2,000 voters is human. Small collectives can be calculated both by name, e.g., "ship" and by constructing a graph, e.g., Gabdulvaleev. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions". So by constructing a graph, such as Gabdulvaleev's. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions" is clear from the fact that the results are exactly the same. It could be 3/5, 7/12, or, as in our case, 10/17. I have no other comments on Natalia's work. Gabdulvaleev's necklace at the TEC "Ufa Ordzhonikidzevskaya" a fine and beautifully presented booty. Print 35629 Tags: FalsificationsInvestigationRF Unified E-Day 2019 Laboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Unified E-Day 2019Theoretic depthObservation Documents to download Homework(.pdf, 1.98 MB) - 1965 download(s) Домашняя работа Related articles Stats 2019. "Correct Answers". The most criminal EDG elections of 2019 according to EG Maxim Ya. Most Criminal Election 2019 Dmitry V. The most criminal elections 2019 Maxim N. The most rigged election of 2019 Margarita J. The most rigged elections of 2019 Please login or register to post comments.
Unified Voting Day 2023 Unified Voting Day 2023 The Turnout Dynamics Analyser EG / Friday, November 10, 2023 0 731 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2023 Armenia, Yerevan, 2023 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 801 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2018 Armenia, Yerevan, 2018 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 802 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2017 Armenia, Yerevan, 2017 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 797 Read more
Twenty-one governors are ready for the probe Twenty-one governors are ready for the probe EG / Friday, October 13, 2023 0 7447 With great delight, we publish twenty-one tools for investigating the gubernatorial elections on the Unified Election Day of 2023. For the first time, you'll put interactive Keisling-Spilkin diagrams to the test, and even more than that. Come on in! Read more