EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Altai Republic, Bashkortostan (Rep. of), Volgograd Oblast, Vologda Oblast, Zabaykalsky Krai, Kalmykia (Republic of), Kursk Oblast, Saint Petersburg (city of), Sakhalin Oblast, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, StatContest 2019. The Criminal Top Three Natalia Z. The most suspicious elections 2019 Homework from Natalia Z. for the Visualizing Democracy course Laborator's note: Natalia has a keen eye! She has discerned valid coincidences between the results in TEC "Nevel ship" and similar TECs in Sakhalin. But as in the case with the Murmansk Ship Commissions, such coincidence has a natural origin. Thus, the graphs obtained in our Laboratory show that the number of voters at the suspicious PECs is 17: While the number of votes for Limarenko is 10. 17, perhaps, is a standard collective of a fishing trawler. And 10 is a coincidence, rare, but not "impossible" with a collective of 17 people. The coincidence of results on small collectives of a dozen or two people is mathematical in nature, while the coincidence on PECs with 1,000-2,000 voters is human. Small collectives can be calculated both by name, e.g., "ship" and by constructing a graph, e.g., Gabdulvaleev. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions". So by constructing a graph, such as Gabdulvaleev's. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions" is clear from the fact that the results are exactly the same. It could be 3/5, 7/12, or, as in our case, 10/17. I have no other comments on Natalia's work. Gabdulvaleev's necklace at the TEC "Ufa Ordzhonikidzevskaya" a fine and beautifully presented booty. Print 39044 Tags: FalsificationsInvestigationRF Unified E-Day 2019 Laboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Unified E-Day 2019Theoretic depthObservation Documents to download Homework(.pdf, 1.98 MB) - 2071 download(s) Домашняя работа Related articles Stats 2019. "Correct Answers". The most criminal EDG elections of 2019 according to EG Maxim Ya. Most Criminal Election 2019 Dmitry V. The most criminal elections 2019 Maxim N. The most rigged election of 2019 Margarita J. The most rigged elections of 2019 Please login or register to post comments.
Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections" Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections" Андрей Бузин / Sunday, September 6, 2020 0 8203 Yes, something must be done with our society, which «still has some flaws». It is very gullible and therefore prefers Shpilkin to Borisov. But it is necessary to implement a number of measures to remove distrust in the procedures for establishing the results of voting». It is possible, for example, to establish not only a captcha for obtaining these results, but to declare them a state secret for disclosure of which one can get 10 years. And for the use of the Gauss function, we should deprive them of the right to correspond. It is time to fight back against the mathematicians who are invading our social processes! Read more
Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report Report of the Russian Public Institute for Electoral Law (RPIEL) EG / Thursday, September 3, 2020 0 9007 3 сентября 2020 года на сайте Российского общественного института избирательного права (РОИИП) был опубликован доклад "Математические инструменты делегитимации выборов". In it, the authors criticized one of the methods of analysis: unimodality. They concluded that "with existing methods of mathematical analysis it is impossible to describe and make an assessment of electoral behavior and voting outcomes" and reduced everything to a "political struggle". We suggest to read how convincingly and reasonably they did it. Read more
A triumphant victory over myself A triumphant victory over myself Сергей Шпилькин / Tuesday, July 21, 2020 0 22357 Сергей Шпилькин made an interesting comparison of statistics from the 2020 Constitution Referendum and the 2018 Presidential Election. Read more
A bell, a saw, an axe A bell, a saw, an axe EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 0 31784 Journalists "Важных историй" Alesya Marokhovskaya and Alexei Smagin made a curious "explainer" in their article. Recommended."Analysts believe that the last vote on amendments to the Constitution was a record-breaking vote on the scale of falsifications. They cite many complex graphs to prove it. «Important Stories» made a simple visual «explanation» which should help to understand them". Read more
Dependence of "Yes" share on types of turnout Dependence of "Yes" share on types of turnout Андрей Бузин / Friday, July 3, 2020 0 17783 Dependencies of "YES" response rates on total, early, and non early turnout in the 2020 nationwide vote: The "YES" response rate has a VERY high correlation with early voting and is almost independent of the July 1 vote. See the following. Read more