Dossier on the Election in the Lab

Dossier on the election available in the Lab -a collection of election information from our site. All materials where this election is mentioned.

Election Cards

Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands

Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands

Gabdulvaleev plotter video lesson

The famous "Saratov 62%" aka "Volodin Peak" is not a myth, but a fact derived from official data. You can see for yourself™ right now. 

Lab Note:

Only the first version tools (v 1.0)  contain datasets for the 2011 and 2016 Duma elections, but you can repeat the experiment for more recent elections. The video was recorded in 2018. Since then, many elections have been uploaded to the Lab, and many similar anomalies have been found. 

Print
25459
Laboratory support for articlefull
Dossier's Block

RF Duma 2016 RF Duma 2011

Theoretic depth
  • Observation
Please login or register to post comments.

Articles on the Elections

Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections"

Андрей Бузин 0 8202

Yes, something must be done with our society, which «still has some flaws». It is very gullible and therefore prefers Shpilkin to Borisov. But it is necessary to implement a number of measures to remove distrust in the procedures for establishing the results of voting». It is possible, for example, to establish not only a captcha for obtaining these results, but to declare them a state secret for disclosure of which one can get 10 years. And for the use of the Gauss function, we should deprive them of the right to correspond.

It is time to fight back against the mathematicians who are invading our social processes!

Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report

Report of the Russian Public Institute for Electoral Law (RPIEL)

EG 0 9004

3 сентября 2020 года на сайте Российского общественного института избирательного права (РОИИП) был опубликован доклад "Математические инструменты делегитимации выборов". In it, the authors criticized one of the methods of analysis: unimodality. 
They concluded that "with existing methods of mathematical analysis it is impossible to describe and make an assessment of electoral behavior and voting outcomes" and reduced everything to a "political struggle". We suggest to read how convincingly and reasonably they did it.

 

A bell, a saw, an axe

EG 0 31651

Journalists "Важных историй" Alesya Marokhovskaya and Alexei Smagin made a curious "explainer" in their article. Recommended.

"Analysts believe that the last vote on amendments to the Constitution was a record-breaking vote on the scale of falsifications. They cite many complex graphs to prove it. «Important Stories» made a simple visual «explanation» which should help to understand them".

RSS
First45679111213Last