Dossier on the Election in the Lab

Dossier on the election available in the Lab -a collection of election information from our site. All materials where this election is mentioned.

Election Cards

External Sources Manager / Friday, August 5, 2016

/ Categories: Russia, Territory of elections, Russia, Machine-readable libraries

Sergey Shpilkin's dataset archive

Election investigator and physicist Sergei Shpilkin has published an array of Russian election data at http://datahub.io/
. His data can be found at: https://datahub.io/organization/ru_elections

The data set includes

Russian presidential elections, 2012
.
Russian State Duma Elections, 2011
Russian Presidential Elections, 2008
Elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation, 2007
Presidential elections in the Russian Federation, 2004
Elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation, 2003
Presidential elections in the Russian Federation, 2000
Russian State Duma elections, 1999 (about 40 per cent of PECs)

Data format:

ODS

Latest update:

09.08.2016

19049

Theoretic depth

Observation

Please login or register to post comments.

Articles on the Elections

The first governor of 2020 has been uploaded to the Lab: Krasnodar Krai

EG / Wednesday, September 23, 2020 0 12737

Despite the CEC's best efforts to close to the public the possibility of processing data from the 2020 Single Voting Day election. Parsings have been received. The first of those elected - the governor of Krasnodar Krai - is already in the Lab.

United Voting Day election data received (Russia)

Telegram channel RUElectionData / Monday, September 21, 2020 0 17544

Let's start uploading EDG 2020 data to the Lab from the telegram channel RuElectionData

Criticism and bibliography

Borisov I.B., Zadorin I.V., Ignatov A.V., Marachevsky V.N., Fedorov V.I., Mathematical tools of election delegitimization. Report of the Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law. Moscow, 2020,

Alexander Shen / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 0 8424

The peer-reviewed paper again raises the question about the incorrectness of the statistical analysis. But it is based on a misunderstanding: the authors rightly point out and confirm with numerous examples that the histograms of elections may well be very different from the «Gaussian» even in the absence of falsifications. Probably, they have not seen the works mentioned above and assume that so far the conclusions about falsifications are based on the deviation from «Gaussianity».

Funny story about the Tambov region