Dossier on the Election in the Lab

Dossier on the election available in the Lab -a collection of election information from our site. All materials where this election is mentioned.

Election Cards

Database of NGO Golos Movement
External Sources Manager

Database of NGO Golos Movement

Machine-readable data library

The Golos Movement collects and processes data from the Central Election Commission of Russia for easy analysis. The Movement's database contains data on more than one hundred thousand elections at various levels in the Russian Federation.

Data format:

*.csv in *.zip archives.

Parsing time:

As a rule, automatically three-four days after publication or upon request. 

Disadvantages noted:

Superfluous lines when commissions change the structure of PECs before and after the election. Digital PECs are not parsed (as of summer 2020).

Digital PECs are not parsed (as of summer 2020).
Instructions:

Go to «Election Calendar», find the elections you need

Image

and on the page that opens, follow the link to download the zip archive with the results.

Image

 

 

Previous Article Ukraine President Re-voting of II round 2004
Next Article Ukraine President I round 2010
Print
12603
Please login or register to post comments.

Articles on the Elections

Criticism and bibliography

Borisov I.B., Zadorin I.V., Ignatov A.V., Marachevsky V.N., Fedorov V.I., Mathematical tools of election delegitimization. Report of the Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law. Moscow, 2020,

Alexander Shen 0 8063

The peer-reviewed paper again raises the question about the incorrectness of the statistical analysis. But it is based on a misunderstanding: the authors rightly point out and confirm with numerous examples that the histograms of elections may well be very different from the «Gaussian» even in the absence of falsifications. Probably, they have not seen the works mentioned above and assume that so far the conclusions about falsifications are based on the deviation from «Gaussianity».

Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections"

Андрей Бузин 0 7786

Yes, something must be done with our society, which «still has some flaws». It is very gullible and therefore prefers Shpilkin to Borisov. But it is necessary to implement a number of measures to remove distrust in the procedures for establishing the results of voting». It is possible, for example, to establish not only a captcha for obtaining these results, but to declare them a state secret for disclosure of which one can get 10 years. And for the use of the Gauss function, we should deprive them of the right to correspond.

It is time to fight back against the mathematicians who are invading our social processes!

Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report

Report of the Russian Public Institute for Electoral Law (RPIEL)

EG 0 8493

3 сентября 2020 года на сайте Российского общественного института избирательного права (РОИИП) был опубликован доклад "Математические инструменты делегитимации выборов". In it, the authors criticized one of the methods of analysis: unimodality. 
They concluded that "with existing methods of mathematical analysis it is impossible to describe and make an assessment of electoral behavior and voting outcomes" and reduced everything to a "political struggle". We suggest to read how convincingly and reasonably they did it.

 

RSS
First34568101112Last