Dossier on the Election in the Lab

Dossier on the election available in the Lab -a collection of election information from our site. All materials where this election is mentioned.

Election Cards

Funny story about the Tambov region

Funny story about the Tambov region

A separate funny story about the Tambov region.

Do you see the horizontal dashes on the turnout of 85-90% and the result of about 30%?

Governor Nikitin's result directly even resembles the cluster of the city of Tambov. One could be happy, but this result is a draw. If you look closely, it also has a non-standard order of candidates: it's not Zhidkov, but Telegin who comes in second place.

These precincts are from the Rasskazovo City TEC, and gubernatorial candidate Igor Telegin is a Rasskazovo businessman and head of the LDPR faction in the regional Duma. In 13 out of 19 polling stations of this TEC, the results of all candidates are obtained by multiplying the number of valid ballots by simple coefficients (and, it seems, Governor Nikitin was given the remainder, adding up rounding errors). And on the other six - they drew for Nikitin, what is there. And, for example, precincts 546 and 547 are in the same school. Also a task for sociologists, no?

Print
26572
Данные для статьиfull
Laboratory support for articlefull
Dossier's Block

RF Unified E-Day 2020 RF Tambov Obl Governor 2020

Theoretic depth
  • Observation
Please login or register to post comments.

Articles on the Elections

Criticism and bibliography

Borisov I.B., Zadorin I.V., Ignatov A.V., Marachevsky V.N., Fedorov V.I., Mathematical tools of election delegitimization. Report of the Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law. Moscow, 2020,

Alexander Shen 0 8171

The peer-reviewed paper again raises the question about the incorrectness of the statistical analysis. But it is based on a misunderstanding: the authors rightly point out and confirm with numerous examples that the histograms of elections may well be very different from the «Gaussian» even in the absence of falsifications. Probably, they have not seen the works mentioned above and assume that so far the conclusions about falsifications are based on the deviation from «Gaussianity».

Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections"

Андрей Бузин 0 7874

Yes, something must be done with our society, which «still has some flaws». It is very gullible and therefore prefers Shpilkin to Borisov. But it is necessary to implement a number of measures to remove distrust in the procedures for establishing the results of voting». It is possible, for example, to establish not only a captcha for obtaining these results, but to declare them a state secret for disclosure of which one can get 10 years. And for the use of the Gauss function, we should deprive them of the right to correspond.

It is time to fight back against the mathematicians who are invading our social processes!

Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report

Report of the Russian Public Institute for Electoral Law (RPIEL)

EG 0 8568

3 сентября 2020 года на сайте Российского общественного института избирательного права (РОИИП) был опубликован доклад "Математические инструменты делегитимации выборов". In it, the authors criticized one of the methods of analysis: unimodality. 
They concluded that "with existing methods of mathematical analysis it is impossible to describe and make an assessment of electoral behavior and voting outcomes" and reduced everything to a "political struggle". We suggest to read how convincingly and reasonably they did it.

 

RSS
First34568101112Last