Dossier on the Election in the Lab

Dossier on the election available in the Lab -a collection of election information from our site. All materials where this election is mentioned.

Election Cards

Georgia, the Parliament 2024

Election card

Official name:

2024 Parliamentary Elections of Georgia

Winner/leader:

Georgian Dream

Wikipedia entry:

2024 Georgian parliamentary election

Wikipedia entry (Rus.):

Парламентские выборы в Грузии (2024)

Previous Article Russia, the President 2024
Print
2006
Original data source:The CEC of Georgia
URL of the source:results.cec.gov.ge/
Data validation fileCEC data for verification 2024-10-28.pdf
ParsingThe CEC of Georgia
Dataset:Georgia Parliament 20241.zip
Date of verification10/27/2024
Verification of the dataset with the source:

Preliminary data for 3,100 out of 3,111 PECs. Discrepancies are consistent with the preliminary nature of the data. The CEC does not publish the number of invalid votes or the number of voters on special lists. The protocol recognition project marks 60 protocols as ‘dirty’.

in the Lab
Please login or register to post comments.

Articles on the Elections

Criticism and bibliography

Borisov I.B., Zadorin I.V., Ignatov A.V., Marachevsky V.N., Fedorov V.I., Mathematical tools of election delegitimization. Report of the Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law. Moscow, 2020,

Alexander Shen 0 8171

The peer-reviewed paper again raises the question about the incorrectness of the statistical analysis. But it is based on a misunderstanding: the authors rightly point out and confirm with numerous examples that the histograms of elections may well be very different from the «Gaussian» even in the absence of falsifications. Probably, they have not seen the works mentioned above and assume that so far the conclusions about falsifications are based on the deviation from «Gaussianity».

Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing Elections"

Андрей Бузин 0 7874

Yes, something must be done with our society, which «still has some flaws». It is very gullible and therefore prefers Shpilkin to Borisov. But it is necessary to implement a number of measures to remove distrust in the procedures for establishing the results of voting». It is possible, for example, to establish not only a captcha for obtaining these results, but to declare them a state secret for disclosure of which one can get 10 years. And for the use of the Gauss function, we should deprive them of the right to correspond.

It is time to fight back against the mathematicians who are invading our social processes!

Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report

Report of the Russian Public Institute for Electoral Law (RPIEL)

EG 0 8568

3 сентября 2020 года на сайте Российского общественного института избирательного права (РОИИП) был опубликован доклад "Математические инструменты делегитимации выборов". In it, the authors criticized one of the methods of analysis: unimodality. 
They concluded that "with existing methods of mathematical analysis it is impossible to describe and make an assessment of electoral behavior and voting outcomes" and reduced everything to a "political struggle". We suggest to read how convincingly and reasonably they did it.

 

RSS
First34568101112Last