EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Categories: Ukraine, Luhansk Oblast, Methods of analysis, Reverse Engineering In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. Boris Ovchinnikov writes: The results of voting are usually determined by an arithmetic operation called addition — first, data from precincts are summed up to get results for district election commissions, and then district results are further summed up into regional and national results. In Luhansk, summation was rejected as a "Bandera method," and multiplication was used instead. Multiplication of numbers made up from thin air. This is evident from the fact that there are two percentage figures — the percentage of turnout relative to the number of registered voters and the percentage of votes in favour of independence relative to valid ballots — that match with a precision of up to three decimal places. 75.2000% and 96.2000% (for reference: if real numbers were summed, with a probability of more than 99.9%, their ratio would yield non-rounded percentages — like 75.2637%). The probability that two rounded percentages coincidentally match this way is less than one in a million. Thus, it can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Print 560 Tags: Ukraine Luhansk obl Referendum 2014 More links Voting results are usually determined by an arithmetic operation such as addition...The original Facebook post by Boris Ovchinnikov. Related articles On the fabricated results of the referendum in the Luhansk region Ukraine, Luhansk oblast, Referendum 2014 Please login or register to post comments.
The first governor of 2020 has been uploaded to the Lab: Krasnodar Krai The first governor of 2020 has been uploaded to the Lab: Krasnodar Krai EG / Wednesday, September 23, 2020 0 13015 Despite the CEC's best efforts to close to the public the possibility of processing data from the 2020 Single Voting Day election. Parsings have been received. The first of those elected - the governor of Krasnodar Krai - is already in the Lab. Read more
United Voting Day election data received (Russia) United Voting Day election data received (Russia) Telegram channel RUElectionData / Monday, September 21, 2020 0 17830 Let's start uploading EDG 2020 data to the Lab from the telegram channel RuElectionData Read more
Criticism and bibliography Criticism and bibliography Borisov I.B., Zadorin I.V., Ignatov A.V., Marachevsky V.N., Fedorov V.I., Mathematical tools of election delegitimization. Report of the Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law. Moscow, 2020, Alexander Shen / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 0 8518 The peer-reviewed paper again raises the question about the incorrectness of the statistical analysis. But it is based on a misunderstanding: the authors rightly point out and confirm with numerous examples that the histograms of elections may well be very different from the «Gaussian» even in the absence of falsifications. Probably, they have not seen the works mentioned above and assume that so far the conclusions about falsifications are based on the deviation from «Gaussianity». Read more
Funny story about the Tambov region Funny story about the Tambov region Сергей Шпилькин / Monday, September 14, 2020 0 28283 Governor Nikitin's result directly even resembles the cluster of the city of Tambov. One could rejoice, but this result is a draw. The result is a draw. Read more
The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Ivan Shukshin / Monday, September 14, 2020 0 25679 Kanevskaya, where I spent my childhood, drew the biggest turnout, 97%. And Pavlovskaya - the biggest percentage to Kondratiev, 94%. Crooks. Read more