EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 27557 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
Russian governors of 2020 already under the microscope Russian governors of 2020 already under the microscope Roman Udot / Sunday, October 4, 2020 0 32618 The data of the gubernatorial elections, kindly provided by Sergei Shpilkin, have been uploaded to the Lab and are ready for independent study. Now you can build your own Governor's Shilo, Respect Fake, Two-humped Governor, and Wall Cloud. But the main thing is to try to find your personal falsification. Read more
Magnitogorsk City Council - unconventional analysis and an amazing flag Magnitogorsk City Council - unconventional analysis and an amazing flag EG / Sunday, October 4, 2020 0 14599 At the request of one of the losing candidates, we uploaded a multi-mandate election. For this purpose we had to conditionally bring 32 districts to one "single district": candidates were grouped by the political party that nominated them. Self-nominated candidates fell into one conditional "party". Only in one district there were two self-nominees. You can already see the resulting picture at Laboratory. The Election Dossier is in the Navigator. From the most amazing: the flag of Magnitogorsk. Read more
New parameters to explore New parameters to explore Roman Udot / Thursday, October 1, 2020 0 29857 But new, non-transparent types of voting in Russia we introduce new parameters for studying elections in the Lab. The "ntransparent vote opens new horizons for your research. Read more
The first governor of 2020 has been uploaded to the Lab: Krasnodar Krai The first governor of 2020 has been uploaded to the Lab: Krasnodar Krai EG / Wednesday, September 23, 2020 0 11530 Despite the CEC's best efforts to close to the public the possibility of processing data from the 2020 Single Voting Day election. Parsings have been received. The first of those elected - the governor of Krasnodar Krai - is already in the Lab. Read more
United Voting Day election data received (Russia) United Voting Day election data received (Russia) Telegram channel RUElectionData / Monday, September 21, 2020 0 15674 Let's start uploading EDG 2020 data to the Lab from the telegram channel RuElectionData Read more