EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Categories: Ukraine, Luhansk Oblast, Methods of analysis, Reverse Engineering In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. Boris Ovchinnikov writes: The results of voting are usually determined by an arithmetic operation called addition — first, data from precincts are summed up to get results for district election commissions, and then district results are further summed up into regional and national results. In Luhansk, summation was rejected as a "Bandera method," and multiplication was used instead. Multiplication of numbers made up from thin air. This is evident from the fact that there are two percentage figures — the percentage of turnout relative to the number of registered voters and the percentage of votes in favour of independence relative to valid ballots — that match with a precision of up to three decimal places. 75.2000% and 96.2000% (for reference: if real numbers were summed, with a probability of more than 99.9%, their ratio would yield non-rounded percentages — like 75.2637%). The probability that two rounded percentages coincidentally match this way is less than one in a million. Thus, it can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Print 560 Tags: Ukraine Luhansk obl Referendum 2014 More links Voting results are usually determined by an arithmetic operation such as addition...The original Facebook post by Boris Ovchinnikov. Related articles On the fabricated results of the referendum in the Luhansk region Ukraine, Luhansk oblast, Referendum 2014 Please login or register to post comments.
Concept of the Electoral.Graphics website Concept of the Electoral.Graphics website EG / Monday, November 9, 2020 0 13798 The concept of the Electoral.Graphics website is to bring together different types of electoral information: elections, data, investigations and research. Producing new knowledge. Read more
Doubting Thomas's Crash Test Doubting Thomas's Crash Test A lesson-investigation. Navigating the site. Working with Scatter Plotter and Gabdulvaleev Plotter EG / Monday, November 9, 2020 0 35805 How to win over opponents, convince the wavering, build confidence in supporters? By properly navigating the site! Read more
Russian governors of 2020 already under the microscope Russian governors of 2020 already under the microscope Roman Udot / Sunday, October 4, 2020 0 38267 The data of the gubernatorial elections, kindly provided by Sergei Shpilkin, have been uploaded to the Lab and are ready for independent study. Now you can build your own Governor's Shilo, Respect Fake, Two-humped Governor, and Wall Cloud. But the main thing is to try to find your personal falsification. Read more
Magnitogorsk City Council - unconventional analysis and an amazing flag Magnitogorsk City Council - unconventional analysis and an amazing flag EG / Sunday, October 4, 2020 0 16924 At the request of one of the losing candidates, we uploaded a multi-mandate election. For this purpose we had to conditionally bring 32 districts to one "single district": candidates were grouped by the political party that nominated them. Self-nominated candidates fell into one conditional "party". Only in one district there were two self-nominees. You can already see the resulting picture at Laboratory. The Election Dossier is in the Navigator. From the most amazing: the flag of Magnitogorsk. Read more
New parameters to explore New parameters to explore Roman Udot / Thursday, October 1, 2020 0 34391 But new, non-transparent types of voting in Russia we introduce new parameters for studying elections in the Lab. The "ntransparent vote opens new horizons for your research. Read more