EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Altai Republic, Bashkortostan (Rep. of), Volgograd Oblast, Vologda Oblast, Zabaykalsky Krai, Kalmykia (Republic of), Kursk Oblast, Saint Petersburg (city of), Sakhalin Oblast, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, StatContest 2019. The Criminal Top Three Natalia Z. The most suspicious elections 2019 Homework from Natalia Z. for the Visualizing Democracy course Laborator's note: Natalia has a keen eye! She has discerned valid coincidences between the results in TEC "Nevel ship" and similar TECs in Sakhalin. But as in the case with the Murmansk Ship Commissions, such coincidence has a natural origin. Thus, the graphs obtained in our Laboratory show that the number of voters at the suspicious PECs is 17: While the number of votes for Limarenko is 10. 17, perhaps, is a standard collective of a fishing trawler. And 10 is a coincidence, rare, but not "impossible" with a collective of 17 people. The coincidence of results on small collectives of a dozen or two people is mathematical in nature, while the coincidence on PECs with 1,000-2,000 voters is human. Small collectives can be calculated both by name, e.g., "ship" and by constructing a graph, e.g., Gabdulvaleev. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions". So by constructing a graph, such as Gabdulvaleev's. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions" is clear from the fact that the results are exactly the same. It could be 3/5, 7/12, or, as in our case, 10/17. I have no other comments on Natalia's work. Gabdulvaleev's necklace at the TEC "Ufa Ordzhonikidzevskaya" a fine and beautifully presented booty. Print 39044 Tags: FalsificationsInvestigationRF Unified E-Day 2019 Laboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Unified E-Day 2019Theoretic depthObservation Documents to download Homework(.pdf, 1.98 MB) - 2071 download(s) Домашняя работа Related articles Stats 2019. "Correct Answers". The most criminal EDG elections of 2019 according to EG Maxim Ya. Most Criminal Election 2019 Dmitry V. The most criminal elections 2019 Maxim N. The most rigged election of 2019 Margarita J. The most rigged elections of 2019 Please login or register to post comments.
Kemerovo Oblast — Kuzbass Kemerovo Oblast — Kuzbass Gubernatorial election, 2023 EG / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 0 860 Read more
Voronezh Oblast Voronezh Oblast Gubernatorial election, 2023 EG / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 0 858 Read more
Tyumen Oblast Tyumen Oblast Gubernatorial election, 2023 EG / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 0 873 Read more
Additions to our Lab: Special tools! Additions to our Lab: Special tools! EG / Tuesday, October 10, 2023 0 6048 We are launching a new section in our Lab: Special tools. Each tool in the lab can be made for an individual election or a group of elections. The first such instrument we place The integrated statistical data analyzer specifically made for the 2023 Unified Election Day. Read more
DIY Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram DIY Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram The presentation of a new interactive tool EG / Monday, September 25, 2023 0 20878 Good news for electoral observers, journalists and election investigators. You have a new and long-awaited tool - the interactive Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram. This detailed video lesson will help you understand how to work with this kit, what the advantages of an integrated approach are, how the tools help each other to detect an anomaly, or how the findings of one tool confirm the findings of another. In the lecture, we detected falsifications in the Moscow region. Read more