EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Altai Republic, Bashkortostan (Rep. of), Volgograd Oblast, Vologda Oblast, Zabaykalsky Krai, Kalmykia (Republic of), Kursk Oblast, Saint Petersburg (city of), Sakhalin Oblast, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, StatContest 2019. The Criminal Top Three Natalia Z. The most suspicious elections 2019 Homework from Natalia Z. for the Visualizing Democracy course Laborator's note: Natalia has a keen eye! She has discerned valid coincidences between the results in TEC "Nevel ship" and similar TECs in Sakhalin. But as in the case with the Murmansk Ship Commissions, such coincidence has a natural origin. Thus, the graphs obtained in our Laboratory show that the number of voters at the suspicious PECs is 17: While the number of votes for Limarenko is 10. 17, perhaps, is a standard collective of a fishing trawler. And 10 is a coincidence, rare, but not "impossible" with a collective of 17 people. The coincidence of results on small collectives of a dozen or two people is mathematical in nature, while the coincidence on PECs with 1,000-2,000 voters is human. Small collectives can be calculated both by name, e.g., "ship" and by constructing a graph, e.g., Gabdulvaleev. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions". So by constructing a graph, such as Gabdulvaleev's. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions" is clear from the fact that the results are exactly the same. It could be 3/5, 7/12, or, as in our case, 10/17. I have no other comments on Natalia's work. Gabdulvaleev's necklace at the TEC "Ufa Ordzhonikidzevskaya" a fine and beautifully presented booty. Print 38600 Tags: FalsificationsInvestigationRF Unified E-Day 2019 Laboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Unified E-Day 2019Theoretic depthObservation Documents to download Homework(.pdf, 1.98 MB) - 2071 download(s) Домашняя работа Related articles Stats 2019. "Correct Answers". The most criminal EDG elections of 2019 according to EG Maxim Ya. Most Criminal Election 2019 Dmitry V. The most criminal elections 2019 Maxim N. The most rigged election of 2019 Margarita J. The most rigged elections of 2019 Please login or register to post comments.
OSCE Statistician Anders Eriksson. Presentation: ODIHR statistical approach OSCE Statistician Anders Eriksson. Presentation: ODIHR statistical approach OSCE Statistical Approach Anders Eriksson / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 5081 OSCE statistical expert Anders Eriksson talks about the OSCE's statistical analysis of the data it receives from observers. Read more
Roman Udot. Presentation of participants and their works Roman Udot. Presentation of participants and their works Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians EG / Thursday, December 14, 2017 0 7306 Roman Udot. Presentation of the participants and their papersPresentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Read more
On Fabricated Election Results in the Donetsk People's Republic On Fabricated Election Results in the Donetsk People's Republic The results of the election for the Head of the Donetsk People's Republic were fabricated. EG / Monday, November 3, 2014 0 230 First, they drew up the percentages and only then calculated the absolute numbers. When votes are counted, rather than results fabricated, the process should be the other way around. Read more
On Elections in Syria On Elections in Syria The election results in Syria are just as fabricated as those in Luhansk. EG / Sunday, June 8, 2014 0 220 The election results in Syria are just as fabricated as those in Luhansk. The organisers also calculated the number of voters based on predetermined percentages. Read more
In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 0 310 It can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Read more