EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 32871 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
OSCE Statistician Anders Eriksson. Presentation: ODIHR statistical approach OSCE Statistician Anders Eriksson. Presentation: ODIHR statistical approach OSCE Statistical Approach Anders Eriksson / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 5393 OSCE statistical expert Anders Eriksson talks about the OSCE's statistical analysis of the data it receives from observers. Read more
Roman Udot. Presentation of participants and their works Roman Udot. Presentation of participants and their works Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians EG / Thursday, December 14, 2017 0 7661 Roman Udot. Presentation of the participants and their papersPresentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Read more
On Fabricated Election Results in the Donetsk People's Republic On Fabricated Election Results in the Donetsk People's Republic The results of the election for the Head of the Donetsk People's Republic were fabricated. EG / Monday, November 3, 2014 0 1034 First, they drew up the percentages and only then calculated the absolute numbers. When votes are counted, rather than results fabricated, the process should be the other way around. Read more
On Elections in Syria On Elections in Syria The election results in Syria are just as fabricated as those in Luhansk. EG / Sunday, June 8, 2014 0 902 The election results in Syria are just as fabricated as those in Luhansk. The organisers also calculated the number of voters based on predetermined percentages. Read more
In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 0 1161 It can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Read more