EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 31670 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
Sergei Shpilkin "Statistical Analysis of Elections" Sergei Shpilkin "Statistical Analysis of Elections" Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Сергей Шпилькин / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 36800 Sergey Shpilkin "Statistical Analysis of Elections" Presentation at the First Roundtable of Mathematicians Read more
Boris Ovchinnikov "Statistics against electoral fraud" Boris Ovchinnikov "Statistics against electoral fraud" Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Boris Ovchinnikov / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 13946 Boris Ovchinnikov's presentation "Statistics against electoral fraud" Read more
Lev Krylenkov.Identification of drawn results Lev Krylenkov.Identification of drawn results Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Lev Krylenkov / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 12938 Lev Krylenkov shows in his presentation on how fraud was detected in the 2014 St. Petersburg gubernatorial election. Read more
Andrei Buzin Megastatistics of Russian quasi-elections Andrei Buzin Megastatistics of Russian quasi-elections Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Андрей Бузин / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 20310 A.Y. Buzin's presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians. "Megastatistics of Russian quasi-elections". Andrey Buzin proposed an extension of the Sobyanin-Sukhovolsky method. Read more
Azat Gabdulvaleev. Elections in graphs. Overview of Russian cities. Azat Gabdulvaleev. Elections in graphs. Overview of Russian cities. Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Azat Gabdulvaleev / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 12216 Azat Gabdulvaleev's presentation at the First Round Table of Mathematicians. Read more