EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 31605 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools Episode of the broadcast of the press conference of the Golos Movement EG / Monday, March 19, 2018 0 24686 Electoral.Graphics tools debut in front of the world's press at the Voice press conference on 03/19/2018 Read more
Two-Humped Moscow Two-Humped Moscow Histogram Generator video lesson Roman Udot / Sunday, March 18, 2018 0 27970 Corroborating falsifications with histograms Read more
Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands Gabdulvaleev plotter video lesson Roman Udot / Saturday, March 17, 2018 0 25391 Utilizing Gabdulwaleev's Plotter to reveal drawn data. Read more
Moscow of a healthy person and Moscow of a smoker Moscow of a healthy person and Moscow of a smoker Scatter Plotter Tool video lesson Roman Udot / Saturday, March 17, 2018 0 25456 The falsifications that caused people to take to the streets of Moscow can be proved with math. Read more
Roman Udot "Statistical Analysis of the Results of the Constitutional Referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Roman Udot "Statistical Analysis of the Results of the Constitutional Referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Roman Udot / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 20822 Roman Udot "Statistical analysis of the results of the constitutional referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Conclusion: official results contradict the real will of citizens. Read more