EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Categories: Ukraine, Luhansk Oblast, Methods of analysis, Reverse Engineering In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. Boris Ovchinnikov writes: The results of voting are usually determined by an arithmetic operation called addition — first, data from precincts are summed up to get results for district election commissions, and then district results are further summed up into regional and national results. In Luhansk, summation was rejected as a "Bandera method," and multiplication was used instead. Multiplication of numbers made up from thin air. This is evident from the fact that there are two percentage figures — the percentage of turnout relative to the number of registered voters and the percentage of votes in favour of independence relative to valid ballots — that match with a precision of up to three decimal places. 75.2000% and 96.2000% (for reference: if real numbers were summed, with a probability of more than 99.9%, their ratio would yield non-rounded percentages — like 75.2637%). The probability that two rounded percentages coincidentally match this way is less than one in a million. Thus, it can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Print 351 Tags: Ukraine Luhansk obl Referendum 2014 More links Voting results are usually determined by an arithmetic operation such as addition...The original Facebook post by Boris Ovchinnikov. Related articles On the fabricated results of the referendum in the Luhansk region Ukraine, Luhansk oblast, Referendum 2014 Please login or register to post comments.
World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools Episode of the broadcast of the press conference of the Golos Movement EG / Monday, March 19, 2018 0 24675 Electoral.Graphics tools debut in front of the world's press at the Voice press conference on 03/19/2018 Read more
Two-Humped Moscow Two-Humped Moscow Histogram Generator video lesson Roman Udot / Sunday, March 18, 2018 0 27957 Corroborating falsifications with histograms Read more
Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands Gabdulvaleev plotter video lesson Roman Udot / Saturday, March 17, 2018 0 25373 Utilizing Gabdulwaleev's Plotter to reveal drawn data. Read more
Moscow of a healthy person and Moscow of a smoker Moscow of a healthy person and Moscow of a smoker Scatter Plotter Tool video lesson Roman Udot / Saturday, March 17, 2018 0 25428 The falsifications that caused people to take to the streets of Moscow can be proved with math. Read more
Roman Udot "Statistical Analysis of the Results of the Constitutional Referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Roman Udot "Statistical Analysis of the Results of the Constitutional Referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Roman Udot / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 20779 Roman Udot "Statistical analysis of the results of the constitutional referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Conclusion: official results contradict the real will of citizens. Read more