EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Altai Republic, Bashkortostan (Rep. of), Volgograd Oblast, Vologda Oblast, Zabaykalsky Krai, Kalmykia (Republic of), Kursk Oblast, Saint Petersburg (city of), Sakhalin Oblast, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, Investigations of this type, StatContest 2019. The Criminal Top Three Natalia Z. The most suspicious elections 2019 Homework from Natalia Z. for the Visualizing Democracy course Laborator's note: Natalia has a keen eye! She has discerned valid coincidences between the results in TEC "Nevel ship" and similar TECs in Sakhalin. But as in the case with the Murmansk Ship Commissions, such coincidence has a natural origin. Thus, the graphs obtained in our Laboratory show that the number of voters at the suspicious PECs is 17: While the number of votes for Limarenko is 10. 17, perhaps, is a standard collective of a fishing trawler. And 10 is a coincidence, rare, but not "impossible" with a collective of 17 people. The coincidence of results on small collectives of a dozen or two people is mathematical in nature, while the coincidence on PECs with 1,000-2,000 voters is human. Small collectives can be calculated both by name, e.g., "ship" and by constructing a graph, e.g., Gabdulvaleev. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions". So by constructing a graph, such as Gabdulvaleev's. The mathematical nature of the phenomenon called "integer fractions" is clear from the fact that the results are exactly the same. It could be 3/5, 7/12, or, as in our case, 10/17. I have no other comments on Natalia's work. Gabdulvaleev's necklace at the TEC "Ufa Ordzhonikidzevskaya" a fine and beautifully presented booty. Print 39140 Tags: FalsificationsInvestigationRF Unified E-Day 2019 Laboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Unified E-Day 2019Theoretic depthObservation Documents to download Homework(.pdf, 1.98 MB) - 2071 download(s) Домашняя работа Related articles Stats 2019. "Correct Answers". The most criminal EDG elections of 2019 according to EG Maxim Ya. Most Criminal Election 2019 Dmitry V. The most criminal elections 2019 Maxim N. The most rigged election of 2019 Margarita J. The most rigged elections of 2019 Please login or register to post comments.
World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools Episode of the broadcast of the press conference of the Golos Movement EG / Monday, March 19, 2018 0 24952 Electoral.Graphics tools debut in front of the world's press at the Voice press conference on 03/19/2018 Read more
Two-Humped Moscow Two-Humped Moscow Histogram Generator video lesson Roman Udot / Sunday, March 18, 2018 0 28192 Corroborating falsifications with histograms Read more
Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands Gabdulvaleev plotter video lesson Roman Udot / Saturday, March 17, 2018 0 25675 Utilizing Gabdulwaleev's Plotter to reveal drawn data. Read more
Moscow of a healthy person and Moscow of a smoker Moscow of a healthy person and Moscow of a smoker Scatter Plotter Tool video lesson Roman Udot / Saturday, March 17, 2018 0 25785 The falsifications that caused people to take to the streets of Moscow can be proved with math. Read more
Roman Udot "Statistical Analysis of the Results of the Constitutional Referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Roman Udot "Statistical Analysis of the Results of the Constitutional Referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Presentation at the I Round Table of Mathematicians Roman Udot / Friday, December 15, 2017 0 20980 Roman Udot "Statistical analysis of the results of the constitutional referendum in the Republic of Armenia" Conclusion: official results contradict the real will of citizens. Read more