EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 29443 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
Andrei Buzin at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Andrei Buzin at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Discussions. Presentation. Андрей Бузин / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 22317 In May 2018, Andrei Buzin participated in the Mathematicians Roundtable II. You can listen and see for yourself™ how it went. Read more
Andrei Buzin "The Evolution of Moscow's Electoral Anomalies" Andrei Buzin "The Evolution of Moscow's Electoral Anomalies" Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Андрей Бузин / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 22426 Andrey Buzin "Evolution of Moscow's electoral anomalies" Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians. Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians. Read more
Roman Udot "Elections in Figures. Using Open Data to Detect Falsification" Roman Udot "Elections in Figures. Using Open Data to Detect Falsification" Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Roman Udot / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 0 18693 How to explain statistical methods to an eight-year-old child. An introduction to researchers and their methods. Read more
World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools World debut of Electoral.Graphics tools Episode of the broadcast of the press conference of the Golos Movement EG / Monday, March 19, 2018 0 23402 Electoral.Graphics tools debut in front of the world's press at the Voice press conference on 03/19/2018 Read more
Two-Humped Moscow Two-Humped Moscow Histogram Generator video lesson Roman Udot / Sunday, March 18, 2018 0 26142 Corroborating falsifications with histograms Read more