EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 29337 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
Roman Udot "Referendum in Armenia 2015 in Numbers and Diagrams" Roman Udot "Referendum in Armenia 2015 in Numbers and Diagrams" Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Roman Udot / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 21809 Read more
II Round Table of Mathematicians. Boris Ovchinnikov. II Round Table of Mathematicians. Boris Ovchinnikov. Discussions. Presentation. Boris Ovchinnikov / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 14776 In May 2018, Boris Ovchinnikov participated in the Mathematicians Roundtable II. You can listen and see for yourself™ how it went. Read more
Participation of Azat Gabdulvaleev in the second round table of mathematicians Participation of Azat Gabdulvaleev in the second round table of mathematicians Discussions. Presentation. Azat Gabdulvaleev / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 15020 In May 2018, Azat Gabdulvaleev participated in the Mathematicians Roundtable II. You can listen and see for yourself™ how it happened. Read more
Azat Gabdulvaleev "Analysis of election results in the city of Grozny using graphical visualization and turnout counting based on video recordings from polling stations" Azat Gabdulvaleev "Analysis of election results in the city of Grozny using graphical visualization and turnout counting based on video recordings from polling stations" Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Azat Gabdulvaleev / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 15693 Azat Gabdulvaleev "Analysis of election results in the city of Grozny using graphic visualization and turnout counting based on video recordings from polling stations The subject of the study is the capital of the Chechen Republic - the city of Grozny. It should be said that Chechnya consistently shows superloyal results in elections at any level. Read more
Azat Gabdulvaleev "Graphical visualization of open data as a simple way to detect anomalies in voting results" Azat Gabdulvaleev "Graphical visualization of open data as a simple way to detect anomalies in voting results" Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Azat Gabdulvaleev / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 11228 One such method is graphical visualization of open data. There is little or no math involved, but the charts can immediately identify some anomalies and indicate areas that need more detailed investigation. So you can visualize open data in a graphical way. Read more