EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 29337 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
Natalia Z. The most suspicious elections 2019 Natalia Z. The most suspicious elections 2019 Homework from Natalia Z. for the Visualizing Democracy course EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 0 35904 The most suspicious EDG 2019 elections according to Natalia Z.: Kalmykia, Bashkortostan, Sakhalin, Volgograd Oblast, Altai, Vologda, St. Petersburg, Kursk Read more
Assignment: find the top three most criminal elections of EDG 2019 Assignment: find the top three most criminal elections of EDG 2019 Assignment for trainees of the Visualizing Democracy course Roman Udot / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 0 44907 Statistical task: find the top three most criminal elections of EDG 2019 (Russia). Staging. Tour of the Laboratory. Read more
Sergey Shpilkin. II Round Table of Mathematicians. 2018 Sergey Shpilkin. II Round Table of Mathematicians. 2018 Closed discussions. Presentation "2018 Azerbaijan presidential elections: What the numbers say" Сергей Шпилькин / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 21823 Sergei Shpilkin. II Round Table of Mathematicians. 2018 Closed discussions of the Round Table. Presentation "2018 Azerbaijan presidential elections: What the numbers say" Sergei Shpilkin. Read more
Sergey Shpilkin "Azerbaijani presidential elections 2018: what the numbers can tell us" Sergey Shpilkin "Azerbaijani presidential elections 2018: what the numbers can tell us" Presentation at the II Round Table of Mathematicians Сергей Шпилькин / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 15981 Sergey Shpilkin "Azerbaijani presidential election 2018: what the numbers can tell" Read more
Alexander Shen. II Roundtable of Mathematicians. 2018 Alexander Shen. II Roundtable of Mathematicians. 2018 Closed discussions of the Round Table Alexander Shen / Wednesday, May 16, 2018 0 37281 Alexander Shen. II Roundtable of Mathematicians. 2018 Closed discussions of the Roundtable. Alexander Shen. Read more