EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Categories: Ukraine, Luhansk Oblast, Methods of analysis, Reverse Engineering In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. Boris Ovchinnikov writes: The results of voting are usually determined by an arithmetic operation called addition — first, data from precincts are summed up to get results for district election commissions, and then district results are further summed up into regional and national results. In Luhansk, summation was rejected as a "Bandera method," and multiplication was used instead. Multiplication of numbers made up from thin air. This is evident from the fact that there are two percentage figures — the percentage of turnout relative to the number of registered voters and the percentage of votes in favour of independence relative to valid ballots — that match with a precision of up to three decimal places. 75.2000% and 96.2000% (for reference: if real numbers were summed, with a probability of more than 99.9%, their ratio would yield non-rounded percentages — like 75.2637%). The probability that two rounded percentages coincidentally match this way is less than one in a million. Thus, it can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Print 189 Tags: Ukraine Luhansk obl Referendum 2014 More links Voting results are usually determined by an arithmetic operation such as addition...The original Facebook post by Boris Ovchinnikov. Related articles On the fabricated results of the referendum in the Luhansk region Ukraine, Luhansk oblast, Referendum 2014 Please login or register to post comments.
Moscow and the Motherland are united Moscow and the Motherland are united Сергей Шпилькин / Thursday, July 2, 2020 0 23276 Not really, the slight bend of the Moscow tail downwards shows that Moscow was rather topping up than overshooting - and you can only hit the point (100%, 100%) by overshooting. UPD: Mistake in the legend. Where it says "norm votes", it should read simply "votes" - including anomalous Read more
Stats 2019. "Correct Answers". The most criminal EDG elections of 2019 according to EG Stats 2019. "Correct Answers". The most criminal EDG elections of 2019 according to EG Responses to the assignment to students of the Visualizing Democracy course. Roman Udot / Tuesday, February 4, 2020 0 46897 In our version, the most criminal gubernatorial elections of EDG-2019 were in Bashkortostan, as well as in Volgograd and Kursk regions. Read more
Maxim Ya. Most Criminal Election 2019 Maxim Ya. Most Criminal Election 2019 Homework from Maxim Y. for the course "Visualizing Democracy" EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 0 40634 The most criminal EDG elections 2019 according to Maxim Y.: Bashkortostan, Volgograd region, Transbaikalia / Kalmykia Read more
Dmitry V. The most criminal elections 2019 Dmitry V. The most criminal elections 2019 Homework from Dmitry V. for the course "Visualizing Democracy" EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 0 46677 The most criminal EDG elections 2019 according to Dmitry V: Bashkortostan, Kalmykia, the third place was shared by: Lipetsk, Vologda, Volgograd regions and Transbaikal Territory. The most criminal EDG elections 2019 according to Dmitry V: Bashkortostan, Kalmykia, the third place was shared by: Lipetsk, Vologda, Volgograd regions and Transbaikal Territory. Read more
Inna K. The most criminal elections 2019 Inna K. The most criminal elections 2019 Homework from Inna K. for the Visualizing Democracy course EG / Saturday, December 7, 2019 0 38697 The most criminal EDG 2019 elections according to Inna K.: Zabaykalsky Krai, Kursk Oblast, Volgograd Oblast. Read more