EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 31804 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region The real turnout in Kuban was ~25% Please login or register to post comments.
Unbelievable data from Venezuela's Presidential election with a Russian smack Unbelievable data from Venezuela's Presidential election with a Russian smack Without any doubt: The official data from the Presidential Elections in Venezuela were fabricated Roman Udot / Wednesday, July 31, 2024 0 689 The numbers announced by Venezuela's electoral commission were fabricated in the same way that they were fabricated in the occupied Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine for the 2024 Russian presidential election. Read more
The voting results in the LNR and Zaporizhzhia regions are fabricated The voting results in the LNR and Zaporizhzhia regions are fabricated The candidates' results do not show the randomness expected from the free expression of citizens' will Roman Udot / Tuesday, March 19, 2024 0 659 Calculations in the commissions of the Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions were carried out in reverse: the number of votes for candidates was obtained by multiplying the turnout by the planned percentages for the candidates. Read more
Unified Voting Day 2023 Unified Voting Day 2023 The Turnout Dynamics Analyser EG / Friday, November 10, 2023 0 917 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2023 Armenia, Yerevan, 2023 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 979 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2018 Armenia, Yerevan, 2018 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 998 Read more