Roman Udot / Saturday, March 17, 2018 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Moscow (city of), Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Retrospective Analysis, Examples and guidelines, Examples and guidelines, Verdict of Electoral.Graphics, Videos Moscow of a healthy person and Moscow of a smoker Scatter Plotter Tool video lesson Falsifications, because of which people took to the streets of Moscow we prove with math.Identifying anomalies with the Scatter Plotter Tool. Construction of a scatter diagram. Comparison of voting data in Moscow at the Presidential (2012) and Duma elections (2011, 2016). Print 23741 Tags: FalsificationsRF President 2012RF Duma 2016RF Duma 2011Investigation Данные для статьиnoLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF President 2012 RF Duma 2016 RF Duma 2011Theoretic depthObservation Related articles Two-Humped Moscow Getting "Saratov 62%" with our own hands Alexander Shen. II Roundtable of Mathematicians. 2018 Alexander Shen "What mathematical statistics can't say" Doubting Thomas's Crash Test Please login or register to post comments.
Unified Voting Day 2023 Unified Voting Day 2023 The Turnout Dynamics Analyser EG / Friday, November 10, 2023 0 735 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2023 Armenia, Yerevan, 2023 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 807 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2018 Armenia, Yerevan, 2018 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 808 Read more
Armenia, Yerevan, 2017 Armenia, Yerevan, 2017 Yerevan City Council election EG / Thursday, November 9, 2023 0 803 Read more
Twenty-one governors are ready for the probe Twenty-one governors are ready for the probe EG / Friday, October 13, 2023 0 7535 With great delight, we publish twenty-one tools for investigating the gubernatorial elections on the Unified Election Day of 2023. For the first time, you'll put interactive Keisling-Spilkin diagrams to the test, and even more than that. Come on in! Read more