Electoral Graphics
en-USru-RU
Language
Search
× Search
Friday, November 22, 2024

Лаборатория

Место ваших открытий

Наша Лаборатория - это главная часть сайта. Миссия проекта - предоставить пользователям инструментарий и данные для самостоятельной работы.

Здесь вы можете сами убедиться насколько честными или маловероятными были различные выборы.

Мы понимаем, что не у каждого есть время, знания или технические возможности для проведения статистических исследований выборов.

Примеры использования

A bell, a saw, an axe

A bell, a saw, an axe

Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution.  

It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results.  

Just scroll down the visualization.

 

Print
29752
Данные для статьиfull
Laboratory support for articlefull
Dossier's Block

RF Constitutional Referendum 2020

Theoretic depth
  • Observation
Please login or register to post comments.
Back To Top